• Privacy Policy
  • Copyright
  • Contacts
Monday, February 16, 2026
Report 24
  • Latest news
  • Press releases
  • Agriculture and fisheries
  • Education
  • Fashion
  • Stock Market
No Result
View All Result
  • Latest news
  • Press releases
  • Agriculture and fisheries
  • Education
  • Fashion
  • Stock Market
No Result
View All Result
Report 24
No Result
View All Result
Home Latest news

Trump administration directs rescission of $1.5B from blue states on health, transportation

in Latest news
Trump administration directs rescission of $1.5B from blue states on health, transportation

In a controversial move, the Trump administration has announced that it will be rescinding a total of $1.5 billion in health and transportation funds from several blue states. This decision has been met with widespread criticism and concern, as the funds were originally meant to support vital projects in these states.

The announcement was made by the White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB) on Thursday, confirming that the funds would be taken back from states such as Colorado, Illinois, California, and Minnesota. The OMB has directed the Department of Transportation to rescind $943 million, while the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services will be rescinding $550 million from California’s Low Income Health Program.

This decision has sparked outrage among politicians and residents of these states, as the funds were allocated to support important projects and services that benefit millions of people. In Colorado, the funds were meant to go towards improving the state’s transportation infrastructure, which is in dire need of repair and modernization. In Illinois, the funds were intended to help provide affordable healthcare to low-income residents. In California, the funds were going towards various health programs, including ones that provide care for children with special needs. In Minnesota, the funds were meant for road and bridge construction, which is crucial for the state’s economy.

The OMB has defended this decision, stating that the funds were unspent and thus no longer necessary. However, this reasoning has been met with skepticism from lawmakers and experts, who argue that the money was deliberately allocated for these projects and rescinding it would have a negative impact on the states and their residents.

Many have also pointed out the discrepancy between the funds being taken from predominantly blue states and the Trump administration’s focus on boosting the economy and supporting infrastructure projects. This move has been viewed by some as a political move aimed at punishing states that did not support the current administration.

Governor Jared Polis of Colorado has expressed his disappointment in the decision, stating that it would have a significant impact on the state’s infrastructure plans. He also criticized the lack of transparency and consultation in this process, as the state was not notified in advance of the decision.

Senator Dick Durbin of Illinois also spoke out against the decision, emphasizing the importance of the low-income health program in his state and the negative consequences of taking away these funds. He urged the administration to reconsider and prioritize the needs of the most vulnerable in society.

The rescinding of these funds has also raised concerns about the federal government’s commitment to supporting essential services and projects in states, particularly in light of recent budget cuts and proposed changes to programs such as Medicaid and Medicare.

In response to the backlash, the OMB has stated that the rescinded funds will be redirected to other projects and programs at the federal level. However, this does little to alleviate the concerns of those who are directly affected by this decision.

In times of economic uncertainty and political division, it is crucial for the federal government to work in collaboration with states to ensure the well-being of all citizens. Rescinding vital funds from states, especially in the midst of a global health crisis, is counterproductive and only serves to further divide the nation.

It is important for the Trump administration to re-evaluate this decision and consider the repercussions it will have on the states and their residents. The health and well-being of all Americans should be a top priority, regardless of their political affiliations. Let us come together and work towards a solution that benefits everyone and promotes unity in the face of adversity.

Tags: Prime Plus
Previous Post

Celebrating 80 Years: Graham & Brown Introduces 8 Iconic Designs, for 8 Iconic Decades

Next Post

Corporate Training Programs: Building Skills, Performance, And Business Impact

Next Post
Corporate Training Programs: Building Skills, Performance, And Business Impact

Corporate Training Programs: Building Skills, Performance, And Business Impact

Recent News

Rotate Ventures Into Lingerie With Love Stories

February 14, 2026

Calvin Klein Collection Fall 2026: Flexing Restraint

February 14, 2026
Trump repeals landmark finding that climate change endangers the public

Trump repeals landmark finding that climate change endangers the public

February 13, 2026
Obama, Dem leaders slam Trump for repeal of EPA climate finding

Obama, Dem leaders slam Trump for repeal of EPA climate finding

February 13, 2026
  • Privacy Policy
  • Copyright
  • Contacts

© 2024 Report 24 - Breaking news & today's latest headlines

No Result
View All Result
  • Latest news
  • Press releases
  • Agriculture and fisheries
  • Education
  • Fashion
  • Stock Market

© 2024 Report 24 - Breaking news & today's latest headlines