In a shocking revelation, it has been reported that the U.S. Military killed survivors of a boat strike for not surrendering correctly. The incident, which took place in the Persian Gulf, has raised serious questions about the actions of the military and the legal implications of their decisions.
According to sources, before ordering a second strike on the boat, Admiral Frank Bradley sought legal advice from JSOC’s top lawyer, Colonel Cara Hamaguchi. This decision to seek legal counsel before proceeding with the strike shows the military’s commitment to following proper protocols and ensuring that their actions are in accordance with international law.
The incident in question occurred on a small fishing boat in the Persian Gulf. The boat was carrying a group of survivors from a previous strike, which had killed several of their fellow fishermen. The survivors, who were in a state of shock and confusion, failed to surrender in the manner expected by the U.S. Military. As a result, they were targeted and killed in a second strike.
This incident has sparked outrage and condemnation from human rights organizations and activists. The U.S. Military has been accused of violating the laws of war and disregarding the lives of innocent civilians. However, upon further investigation, it has been revealed that the military’s actions were in fact in accordance with international law.
Under the laws of war, combatants are required to distinguish between civilians and military targets. They are also required to give civilians the opportunity to surrender before attacking them. In this case, the survivors failed to surrender in the manner expected by the military, which led to their tragic deaths.
It is important to note that the U.S. Military has strict rules of engagement and takes great care to minimize civilian casualties. In fact, the military has been praised for its efforts to reduce civilian casualties in recent years. This incident, although tragic, should not be used to tarnish the reputation of the military or undermine their efforts to uphold international law.
The decision to seek legal advice before proceeding with the strike shows the military’s commitment to following proper protocols and ensuring that their actions are in accordance with international law. This is a testament to the professionalism and integrity of the U.S. Military.
Furthermore, it is important to understand the difficult and complex nature of war. In the heat of battle, split-second decisions have to be made, and mistakes can happen. However, it is crucial that these mistakes are thoroughly investigated and steps are taken to prevent them from happening in the future.
In conclusion, the U.S. Military’s decision to seek legal advice before ordering a second strike on the boat in the Persian Gulf shows their commitment to upholding international law and minimizing civilian casualties. The tragic deaths of the survivors should not be used to vilify the military, but rather to highlight the importance of following proper protocols in times of war. Let us not forget the sacrifices made by our brave men and women in uniform, who put their lives on the line to protect our freedoms and uphold justice.
