AG Gentner Drummond, a candidate for governor in Oklahoma, has recently come under fire for his handling of the case of Richard Glossip, a death row inmate who has been fighting for his freedom for over two decades. Court filings have revealed new details about Drummond’s flip-flopping on the issue, raising questions about his true motivations and priorities.
Glossip, who has maintained his innocence since his conviction in 1997, was scheduled to be executed in September 2015. However, his execution was stayed at the last minute due to a shortage of the lethal injection drug. This gave Glossip’s legal team the opportunity to present new evidence and arguments in his case.
One of the key players in this legal battle was AG Gentner Drummond, who had the power to either push for Glossip’s execution or to advocate for his release. Initially, Drummond seemed to be in favor of the former, stating that he believed Glossip was guilty and that the evidence against him was strong.
However, as the case progressed and more evidence came to light, Drummond’s stance began to shift. In a meeting with Glossip’s lawyer, he reportedly stated that the timing of Glossip’s release hinged “on his own political calculus.” This statement raised eyebrows and led to speculation about Drummond’s true intentions.
It is no secret that Drummond is currently running for governor in Oklahoma. And it is not uncommon for politicians to use high-profile cases like Glossip’s to boost their own image and gain public support. However, in this case, it seems that Drummond’s political ambitions may have clouded his judgment and caused him to waver on the issue of Glossip’s release.
The fact that Drummond’s stance on Glossip’s case changed so drastically and seemingly for political reasons is deeply concerning. It raises questions about his integrity and his commitment to justice. As a candidate for governor, Drummond should prioritize the well-being and rights of the people of Oklahoma above his own political gain.
Furthermore, the timing of Drummond’s flip-flopping is also suspicious. It seems that as the evidence against Glossip continued to mount, Drummond realized that advocating for his execution would not be a popular move. Therefore, he changed his stance in order to appease the public and gain their support.
This kind of political maneuvering is unacceptable, especially when it involves the life of a man who has been on death row for over 20 years. It is a clear indication that Drummond’s priorities lie with his own political ambitions rather than with the well-being of the people he is supposed to serve.
The case of Richard Glossip has garnered national attention and has become a symbol of the flaws and injustices in the American justice system. It is a case that has divided the public and sparked debates about the death penalty and the power of prosecutors. And in the midst of all this, AG Gentner Drummond’s actions have only added fuel to the fire.
As a candidate for governor, Drummond should be held to a higher standard. He should be transparent and honest in his actions and decisions, especially when it comes to matters of life and death. His flip-flopping on the issue of Glossip’s release has shown a lack of integrity and a disregard for justice.
In conclusion, the recent court filings have shed new light on AG Gentner Drummond’s handling of the Richard Glossip case. They have revealed a politician who is more concerned with his own political gain than with the well-being of the people he is supposed to serve. As voters, it is our responsibility to hold our leaders accountable and demand integrity and justice from them. The case of Richard Glossip is a reminder of the importance of electing leaders who prioritize the rights and well-being of their constituents above their own personal gain.
